Sex shouldn’t be widespread in nature, but a new study shows why it is – The Economist


The Economist

Sex shouldn't be widespread in nature, but a new study shows why it is
The Economist
About two billion years ago single-celled organisms began exchanging and mixing up genetic information in ways modern biologists recognise as rudimentary forms of sex—though it would be well over a billion years more before animals evolved nervous …

and more »

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *